23 Nov
2006
23 Nov
'06
9:57 p.m.
Frank Barknecht wrote:
difference between both is illustrated in attached patch.
thanks, ok, i think i will use metro in most future pd-sequencer patches, instead of my old phasor-method... it was a 'quick-and-dirty' solution anyway, since i have sampled the phasor with metro 3 or 2 and snapshot (so there would have been no benefit from the audio-phasor), i thougt something like the 200 hz 'control-rate a la reaktor' would be sufficient. maybe the main reason for using the phasor was, that i had read something about timing-issues with the metro object. (i can not recall it exactly...)
bis denn! martin