Hi Dan,
Thanks for getting back to me. Yap, I had a look at the protocol and is like you said about retro-compatibility. I'm glad to hear that probably can be dealt with making some changes in s_midi.c, work that of course I know still takes some efforts. My question though, was more related to the new msg introduced by MIDI 2.0, with a different structure and resolution. But I suspect what you said is valid for that as well, right?
Cheers, Mario
On Mon, 6 Apr 2020 at 14:23, Dan Wilcox danomatika@gmail.com wrote:
Actually, form what I've read, I don't think MIDI 2 requires any (or very many) changes to Portmidi as Portmidi wraps the various OS-level MIDI APIs and gives you raw bytes. The actual MIDI protocol interpretation is handled in the Pd core.
MIDI 2 is basically an extension of the MIDI 1 protocol and MIDI 2 messages can contained embedded MIDI 1 messages. There is an additional query communication where a device can ask about the capabilities of another device. Overall, it seems to be designed to work seamlessly with older MIDI 1 devices/software.
Short answer is: I don't think anyone is doing this, but it can probably been done by modifying MIDI handling in s_midi.c.
On Apr 6, 2020, at 12:00 PM, pd-list-request@lists.iem.at wrote:
Message: 1 Date: Mon, 6 Apr 2020 10:51:26 +0100 From: Mario Buoninfante mario.buoninfante@gmail.com To: pd-list pd-list@lists.iem.at Subject: [PD] MIDI 2.0 Message-ID: CAHs=M8TCE+Yom8WoXoCDR7jZi_pzFmM3t0dKDwRU0_6dwFaYSw@mail.gmail.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Hi all,
Is there any plan to support MIDI 2.0? I know this is more of a question about PortMidi, but I was wondering if anybody knows anything about it.
Cheers, Mario
Dan Wilcox @danomatika http://twitter.com/danomatika danomatika.com robotcowboy.com