marius schebella a écrit :
circle, yes, but why should the width of [rectangle 4 3] be 8, and the height 6??? It is not what one would expect?
a [rectangle 4 3] is not based on this point : (0,0); (x,0); (x,y); (0,y). it is centered. so i think it's quit logic to have a [rectangle x,y] based on (-x,-y);(x,y)... better than (-x/2,-y/2) etc.
Gem is like this since the begining and you're the 1st (as i remember) complaining about this.
cyrille
m.
cyrille henry wrote:
yes. the radius of a [circle 1] is 1. so it's diameter is 2, like all other Gem object.
cyrille
marius schebella a écrit :
hi, I am a little bit confused... is it possible that all objects in Gem are drawn twice as big as they should???
[gemhead] | [translateXYZ 2 0 0] | [square 2]
size 2 of the square should be the width (=height). but translate 2 only shifts the square half of its width. or am I misunderstanding something? please help! marius.
PD-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list