I absolutely agree with you, Hans! Onyx is doing great live playing with traditional rhythms and phrasings using his own custom built "wind controller" and Pd. I'm not sure what would classify music with no rhythmical elements and scales and chords as being more artistic?
Ingo
-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- Von: pd-list-bounces@iem.at [mailto:pd-list-bounces@iem.at] Im Auftrag von Hans-Christoph Steiner Gesendet: Sonntag, 19. Juni 2011 17:32 An: Mathieu Bouchard Cc: pd-list@iem.at; Marco Donnarumma Betreff: Re: [PD] Pd performance at TED
On Jun 19, 2011, at 9:50 AM, Mathieu Bouchard wrote:
On Sun, 19 Jun 2011, Marco Donnarumma wrote:
it seems quite sad to me that the first performance with pd at ted
has to be this. With all the respect due to Onyx, but using control
sensor to play as a dj seems a technological parody. Besides, the
whole system looks a bit clunky, doesn't it?Does it ?
Do you care to explain yourself ?
What's a « technological parody » ?
And what's that thing you call a « dj » ? You use it in your own
name thesaddj. What's your relationship with that word ?
I think the key is not what it looks like, but what he does with it.
He's making music with it (no ifs, ands, or buts), he clearly has
musical skill with his instrument, and is able to keep the musical
timing tight. These are all difficult things to do, and from what
I've seen 95% of performance with new interfaces for musical
expression does not achieve one of those goals solidly.
.hc
"Making boring techno music is really easy with modern tools, but with
live coding, boring techno is much harder." - Chris McCormick
Pd-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list