Re: [PD] limiter questions

Hey Frank,

I was curious his reasons, but no value judgment implied ;-)

I figured either he wanted to stay Vanilla or he was experimenting with building from low level objects as an exercise.

Actually it's past time that I take a spin through rj-library just to see how things are handled with only vanilla. If only there was time... sigh....

Does the rj-lib limiter do everything in audio domain, or does it also use [env~]?

D.

Frank Barknecht wrote:

Hallo, Derek Holzer hat gesagt: // Derek Holzer wrote:

...

1. Is there any reason not to use [limiter~] (i.e. to stay Vanilla)?

Staying vanilla can be a pretty good reason e.g. if you want your patch to run on RjDj, too. OTOH the rj-library already contains a (vanilla) limiter with [e_dynproc] which also acts as noisegate, compressor and expander.

Ciao