On Thu, 2007-10-04 at 13:03 +0100, Andy Farnell wrote:
On Thu, 04 Oct 2007 01:16:03 +0200 Roman Haefeli reduzierer@yahoo.de wrote:
personally, i think as well, that these objects are good candidates to be inlcuded to pd-vanilla, as well as these: [abs~], [sgn~]
roman
Would get my vote. They are fairly essential core components. Shame about this Windows filename problem though, perhaps [gt~] and [lt~] are better names in that case.
if they would be included into pd-vanilla, the name issue wouldn't be an issue anymore. and for consistency's sake it would be even better, if they kept their old names, since [<] and [>] are already part of pd. though, i don't know if it would lead to any problems, if internals steal the names of externals. at least i cannot think of any, if the behaviour is the same.
roman
___________________________________________________________ Der frühe Vogel fängt den Wurm. Hier gelangen Sie zum neuen Yahoo! Mail: http://mail.yahoo.de