D'oh! Re-replying with the right subject. =o(
On Mon, Jun 30, 2008 at 5:41 PM, Matt Barber brbrofsvl@gmail.com wrote:
You can see the attached patch if you want linear interpolation and can stand a little delay. More intricate interpolations (any of the cubic ones posted in the [tabread4~] thread, e.g.) can be done in this way at the expense of more processing and longer delay.
Matt
Date: Mon, 30 Jun 2008 18:10:46 +0200 From: Atte Andr? Jensen atte.jensen@gmail.com Subject: Re: [PD] raw resampling To: Claude Heiland-Allen claudiusmaximus@goto10.org Cc: pure data pd-list@iem.at Message-ID: 48690586.7010300@gmail.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Claude Heiland-Allen wrote:
in~ [phasor~ 4410] | | [samphold~] | out~
Ah, of course!
Note: this doesn't change the sample rate, but resamples the signal at 4410Hz. Not sure if this is what you want, but it's what I use if I want lots of aliasing...
I didn't really expect to have a signal at 4410. Would that have any benefits, for instance with regards to performance?
Basically I (like you) just want to hear some alias noise!
-- peace, love & harmony Atte
http://atte.dk | http://myspace.com/attejensen http://anagrammer.dk | http://modlys.dk