On 25/04/2008, at 19.25, Steffen Juul wrote:
On 25/04/2008, at 18.34, Frank Barknecht wrote:
Hallo, Andy Farnell hat gesagt: // Andy Farnell wrote:
Fundamentally, [z~] is a *very* useful primitive to have
I think, fundamentally z~ is just delread~/delwrite~ with a different way to specify delay times, slightly better performance because it doesn't allow many things delread~/delwrite~ can do, and no need to employ two objects. Or am I missing something?
Maybe that your implementation uses an unsupported feature?
I gotta point out that my intention was not to be rude, but rather to
point out that if, and i may very well be wrong, z~ implementations
need dynamic patching which is an unsupported feature then its not a
robust solution hence not the best to add to a printed book.
I'm sorry if i seamed rude, i just tried to be brief.