Hallo, Charles Henry hat gesagt: // Charles Henry wrote:
Doesn't tabwrite~ have a second inlet to set the name of the array (It's been awhile)? If so, then what harm could there be in re-writing the object with 3 inlets? Would it break something?
It just has one inlet, you change the table to set with "set NAME" messages into the first inlet.
So, yes, adding a second inlet should not change anything there. But it gets a bit tricky later on: How should you deal with a [bang( message that goes into the first inlet when there's something connected to the new audio-index inlet? There is a conflict of interest, which IMO is better solved with a new object.
Actually I like the name [tabfeed~], as it somehow describes, that with audio index inlets you kind of constantly feed data into the table.
Ciao
Frank