matteo sisti sette wrote:
Testing with 0.40.1 on Windows XP.
hi. i remember the same (or very similar) behaviour a few years ago (on linux). my base patch was very similar (random oscillators, but also controlled oscillators) so it did not bother me too much (as i had several 100 to 1000 of them; 1 missing would not make a big difference) i have not investigated why it is like this. probably time to do it.
mfga.sdr IOhannes