Put far more clearly and effectively than I did. Thanks Jonathan.
On 2012-03-10, at 12:08 PM, Jonathan Wilkes jancsika@yahoo.com wrote:
I'm changing the subject so that a discussion about the change in tone of this list doesn't carry the unfair implication that it's due to one member.
I don't see a problem complaining about the netiquette of a list member, but I just ask that it be clear, constructive criticism.
-Jonathan
From: Dafydd Hughes dafydd61@gmail.com To: ALAN BROOKER alan.brooker2010@gmail.com Cc: mahatGma rabintrah mahatgma@gmail.com; pd-list@iem.at Sent: Saturday, March 10, 2012 11:06 AM Subject: Re: [PD] Is there a way to block/filter Mathieu ?
Hey folks
Maybe I'm out of touch here, or hypersensitive (I quit smoking far too long ago for it to be that, but I can totally sympathize with those for whom it's fresh - hell, I still miss it 15 years later)...
As I understand it, if there are complaints about the behaviour of a specific member of the list, the first step is to approach the list administrators. Is this correct?
And there are pretty widely accepted norms about language (I'm talking about agressive langage and expletives here) on the list, too, even if they're not written down, correct?
I took a bit of a break (about a year and a half) from regularly reading the pd-list while I completed some schooling. Since getting back to following the list, I've noticed a big change in the tone. I have to agree with Alan Brooker:
Overall, I think the tone of late has become too belligerent, lets get some good will together.
Had the mood on pd-list been like this when I started with Pd, I probably wouldn't have stuck around. Instead, I found it an incredibly supportive, open and generous community. That's one of Pd's strengths, isn't it?
cheers dafydd
Pd-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list