16 Sep
2011
16 Sep
'11
2:43 p.m.
On Fri, 2011-09-16 at 14:05 +0200, Ingo wrote:
Wow, I just compared your version of [pd digital message] with mine and yours takes only 180ms to process 1000000 of messages, while mine uses over 8s. Frankly, I wouldn't have expected such a big difference.... Let me dig into this.
Roman
That's more than I would have expected, too! I would have been guessing it could be up to 10x as fast but not 50x.
I think I'm going to put your much more efficient version into the git version.
Roman