Hallo, João Miguel Pais hat gesagt: // João Miguel Pais wrote:
which license would be advised for free software, and in concrete for pd
patches? I was thinking about something free to all uses, but where
reference to the original creator would be kept. in the CC site they
advise to choose other licenses to software than their's.
Generally Pd's license is well accepted in the comunity, another popular choice is the GPL. I would recommend to stay away from trying to make up your own license.
There seems to be no consensus about wether a patch, that uses externals released under GPL, should have to be GPL, too. Personally I don't believe it has to be GPL, but I think, IOhannes once argued that it has to be GPL as well. (Which would mean, that all patches using [expr] would need to be GPL, btw.)
Ciao
Frank Barknecht _ ______footils.org_ __goto10.org__