On 10/04/2012 11:27 AM, Patrice Colet wrote:
De: "Roman Haefeli" reduzent@gmail.com
On Thu, 2012-10-04 at 16:23 +0200, Patrice Colet wrote:
Thank you roman, didn't try this one...
I'd like to know what was the bug
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=478070&aid=2950978&...
because it gives wrong sample resolution
Didn't know about this one. Please report it, so that hopefully it gets fixed. Does it work correctly with [ext13/wavinfo]?
Yes it does,
but anyway, my bad, I didn't read carefuly enough the help file that is saying sample resolution in *bytes*, not in *bits*.
maybe one day [soundfile_info] will read aiff files as well...
There are two separate issues here:
- it would be lovely to have a single [soundfile_info] that gets the
meta data from any soundfile, like how [readanysf~] will play any soundfile
- People should be free to write whatever software they want. If
existing objects don't work for them, they write new ones. Therefore we have [wavinfo] and [soundfile_info].
So really, I think the best solution would be to leave both [wavinfo] and [soundfile_info] as they are, and focus efforts on making a [anysfinfo] based on gmerlin using [readanysf~] as a template.
.hc