Hi all,
At IRCAM's request, I've quit distributing the source code to the paf~ object. I think this means I have to distribute paf~ separately from Pd proper. I haven't got this packaged yet.
In the meantime, to respect IRCAM's wishes on this, it would be best not to try to maintain paf~ sources in CVS.
cheers Miller
On Tue, Sep 23, 2003 at 02:04:29AM +0200, Thomas Grill wrote:
Hi Miller, hi all, i'm about to update the cvs considering the latest pd release.
I stumbled over (at least) two points:
- there's no paf~ in my pd for Windows package anymore. Is this intended?
- for the extras, there are (the same) helpfiles in the extra folder, as
well as in the subfolders therein. Which one is the right location?
Also apart from that, it is becoming increasingly difficult to keep the cvs in sync with the releases, mainly because of the different platforms and the various portaudio/portmidi dependencies. I'm i right suspecting that you, Miller, have a source tree that is equivalent to the one in the cvs? If this assumption is correct would it be too difficult if you checked in the main branch each time there is a new release? Keeping the development branches in sync would then also be much easier.
best greetings, Thomas
PD-list mailing list PD-list@iem.at http://iem.at/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pd-list