On 5 Dec 2007, at 12:28 PM, Chris McCormick wrote:
On Wed, Dec 05, 2007 at 12:18:51AM +0100, Roman Haefeli wrote:
On Tue, 2007-12-04 at 18:19 +0100, Frank Barknecht wrote:
Hallo, Miller Puckette hat gesagt: // Miller Puckette wrote:
I think it's a real question whether it's better to have Pd act
similarly across all platforms or whether it's best to adapt key bindings,
etc., to specific ones. Certainly the first solution makes long-term
maintainabilty (a high priority for me) easier.I'm for sensible Pd-specific default shortcuts plus - in the longer term - user-configurable shortcuts. Imagine if Emacs or Vi would follow MS-Windows-guidelines ...
my vote goes clearly for same behaviour of pd over all platforms.
Same here, but with a configuration option for 'use platform
keybindings' for people who want that.
in OSX most of the OS 'standard' bindings use apple-, so one way to
look at it for that platform is keep the cntrl- bindings exactly as
they are cross platform, and then make the apple- bindings more OSX-
like. At present I understand that the apple- binding are actually
exactly the same as the cntrl- ones, probably due to the way it has
been implemented.
simon