On Nov 23, 2005, at 3:56 AM, Thomas Grill wrote:
Hi Mathieu, hi all,
Am 23.11.2005 um 03:28 schrieb Mathieu Bouchard:
On Wed, 23 Nov 2005, Georg Holzmann wrote:
Oh, I'd love to have PDContainer in Pd. ;)
I don't think that this will ever happen, because it's written in
C++ and uses STL ...Quick survey: how open are developers to the following ?
(a) inclusion of C++ code in Pd devel branch
(b) inclusion of C++ STL code in Pd devel branch
in principle i'm positive to both, because every c compiler i know of
is able to compile c++. On the other hand, i'm not in favor of inclusion of externals into PD.
To my mind this is a question of packaging, not of core functionality. I personally would even throw out so-called internals and all
graphical objects of course, with a compact kernel remaining.
Yes, definitely. Everything should be a lib. Then you could easily
swap out any of the core objects for some of your own. Something like
[pd/send] vs. [mylibrary/send].
.hc
Using ReBirth is like trying to play an 808 with a long stick. -David Zicarelli