Hallo, Claude Heiland-Allen hat gesagt: // Claude Heiland-Allen wrote:
Many feedback scenarios are not possible with signals in blocks, and also some non-feedback processes do not work with signals in blocks if there is a signal->message->signal flow.
See attached patch: it would be cool if the table would show a staggered line when the bng is clicked, however it shows only a straight line, which indicates that the output of [threshold~] doesn't reach the lower [phasor~] in time.
I think, you're missing to send a 0 to threshold's right inlet. And I don't see a vline~ anywhere in your patch! ;)
Your patch brings up the problem, that the right, phase inlet of phasor~ or osc~ is not prepared to deal with clock delayed messages, but only handles "normal" messages, that is, it quantizes these messages to block boundaries. I think, I mentioned this in this thread already. We should open a feature request.
I made another built-in clone for phasor~ with metro and vline~ called vhasor~. Here the phase inlet is accepting and evaluating clock delayed messages.
Then additionally I'm not sure, if the right inlet of threshold~ deals clockdel messages correctly. As I understand the source code, it does some extra work to generate clock delayed messages as well, however my attached test patch still doesn't stagger correctly. I'm not sure yet, why.
Ciao
Frank Barknecht _ ______footils.org_ __goto10.org__