22 Jun
2009
22 Jun
'09
8:55 p.m.
Am 22.06.2009 um 08:56 schrieb IOhannes m zmoelnig:
Max wrote:
great. now i get iohannes' irony.
it really wasn't irony (but of course it only makes sense if you
knew that [pix_buffer_filmopen] is implemented as an abstraction):
if you do have a modified patch of pix_buffer_filmopen and want it
to be included into upcoming releases, please post it to the patch- tracker at http://sf.net/prjects/pd-gem
IOhannes, i'm deeply flattered to be able to contribute. you'll find
the patches in the tracker.
max