18 May
2010
18 May
'10
5:12 p.m.
Roman
P.S.: @pdmtl guys It's plain wrong to have a wet/dry parameter for dynamic processing fx. It just doesn't make sense at all to have the compressor output mixed with the input signal (It not only doesn't make sense, it even adds strange phasing effects, if the the dynamic processor uses a look-ahead delay). Can we agree on that? And if not, can we discuss this, so that we finally can agree on that?
yes i do agree. for me it was important to have wet/dry for all fx, but of course it doesn't make sense for all fx.
there's mtl also available: http://puredata.info/Members/mtl/index_html
à +