I'm still thinking about it. On the plus side, it would make Pd users' lives easier; on the minus, it would introduce a new library dependence and thus reduce Pd's portability.
The OSC design is not much better than that of MIDI, in my opinion... it's a pity it's so widely adopted.
cheers Miller
On Sat, Jan 05, 2008 at 12:20:43PM -0600, Kyle Klipowicz wrote:
Ahaha I KNEW it!
Well, did Miller ever weigh in on this?
~Kyle
On Jan 5, 2008 9:30 AM, Chris McCormick chris@mccormick.cx wrote:
On Jan 4, 2008 10:23 PM, Chris McCormick chris@mccormick.cx wrote:
On Thu, Jan 03, 2008 at 04:26:56PM +0100, Frank Barknecht wrote:
There will be no direct support for OSC in [sssad] unless Miller decides to include some OSCroute-variant in plain Pd, as sssad will never require externals.
Has anyone lobbied Miller for this feature? http://lists.puredata.info/pipermail/pd-list/2005-11/033012.html but
On Sat, Jan 05, 2008 at 01:08:24AM -0600, Kyle Klipowicz wrote:
Wait, isn't OSC GNU? Deja vu for some reason...
Read the thread.
Best,
Chris.
--
---- -----
http://perhapsidid.wordpress.com http://myspace.com/kyleklipowicz
PD-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list