That was an interesting outline of possibilities for getting paid for
creative activities. But it left out one of the major forces in the
world of Free Software: people doing it because its fun. A lot of
hackers like to work on free software projects because they get to
write whatever code they want, however they want, and on their own
schedule. You could call it the "hobby" model.
.hc
On Mar 10, 2011, at 11:23 AM, august wrote:
Pierre,
These are very interesting and specific questions you have asked. I'm pretty sure there will be widely varied responses. How to pay for the development of free software is a major gaping hole between two viable logics, one that says you need to horde your own labor for personal gain (and so as not to be exploited), and another that says you grow more wealth collectively if you share with others. There is a ton of literature on the theory, but I find little on the practice. Who is doing what?
I just now discovered the following recent articles from the free cultural forum and thought I'd pass it along:
http://fcforum.net/sustainable-models-for-creativity
In it they outline in not too many words various economic models for sustainable cultural (software included) development.
best -august.
On Tue, 8 Mar 2011, Pierre Massat wrote:
I was trying to get Ardour to work last night and i came accross the forum on their website. I must say i was quite shocked to see how many posts were about money. I was equally surprized to see that the latest full version of Ardour isn't free (although you can name your price).
"Name your price" is actually a characteristic of the download site, not the software.
From what I read, Ardour remains FLOSS nonetheless.
- What are the economics of open source software, and how
sustainable is the model?
FLOSS is not an economic model, it's a set of licenses (and of potential future licenses with the same basic characteristics).
You use the license as a tool to come up with an economic model of your choice, but there are many possibilities, both with a pure FLOSS license (which is the case of Ardour), and with a hybrid approach (involving proprietary licenses in some way).
How does it work for Pd?
There is no such system for the Pd community. Each developer has his/her own "economic model", which usually means something noneconomic like donating plenty of time for little return.
- I get the feeling that open source developpers used to think
that the idea of free (free beer...) software was cool, but 10 to 15 years down the line (that is, now) they're beginning to realize that they can't keep on doing this forever. Am I wrong here?
It possibly happens to *lots* of people, but it doesn't make the FLOSS movement getting any smaller.
I have been considering making a donation since i've been using Pd extensively for a few years now. But could someone tell me exactly how it works? Who gets the money?
The person who gets the money is the person you send it to.
And i never use GEM or Gridflow (cause i have no need for it at the moment), so i don't see why part of my donation should go to Mathieu or GEM's author(s).
What makes you think that GEM's authors and I are somehow not contributing anything significant to Pd-vanilla ?
Pd-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
'You people have such restrictive dress for women,’ she said, hobbling
away in three inch heels and panty hose to finish out another pink-
collar temp pool day. - “Hijab Scene #2", by Mohja Kahf