Hallo, Hans-Christoph Steiner hat gesagt: // Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
On Nov 29, 2009, at 3:26 AM, Frank Barknecht wrote:
I have written a bit about Pd's messages on puredata.info, feel free to quote as much as you like. I'm not the right person to fix pd-extended docs. I can't even create all objects in that patch and bug 2026128 is still open, which indicates, that we believe different things about data types and messages. I don't want to get into that discussion again. :)
The PDDP docs predate pd-extended. The PDDP could easily be distributed or used by anyone. That patch is related to PDDP. But yes, Pd-extended does include the PDDP docs. What's the point of writing all this email about the topic if it doesn't actually end up in something useful? Few people read the archives...
I don't understand this anti-Pd-extended puritanism. Does distributing docs or code in Pd-extended somehow taint it with evil? I think the PDDP docs are mostly really good. Most of that work was done by Dave Sabine.
Why wouldn't we use it and keep it up to date?
Hey, all I said is that *I* am not the right person to do that.
Ciao
Frank