26 Feb
2016
26 Feb
'16
7:08 a.m.
really? can't see how much more relevantly efficient it'd be, and it kinda does check it already, hence the errors
cheers
2016-02-26 3:07 GMT-03:00 i go bananas hard.off@gmail.com:
I would assume it's also slightly more efficient that pd doesn't have to check the vector size when processing the s~ / r~ functions.