Thanks Frank and Tim,
from what you say, I understand that in order to force a certain directin of DSP flow (either directly, or as in the execution order example), I *have* to use patch cords in one way or the other. OK.
I admit that I am rather clueless with respect to core programming, but if that is the information that is needed by pd to sort things right, then implementing a "substitute patch cords by send~/receive~"-feature wouldn't seem especially non-trivial to me (although it is certainly more work than I imagine at the moment).
--Matthias
Frank Barknecht schrieb:
Hallo, Matthias Blau hat gesagt: // Matthias Blau wrote:
however, it is not that easy: no loops in my patches (I wouldn't have been able to substitute them by patch cords would I), but nonetheless delays between r~s.
Did you read 3.audio.examples/G05.execution.order.pd and see if this helps in your case? (Maybe the patch has another name in your Pd installation, search for "execution.order".)
Ciao