Well, after Frank's comment I searched the archive and found this article: http://www.unicom.com/pw/reply-to-harmful.html which convinces me that the lack of the reply-to header is rather a feature than a shortcoming.
But it really isn't intuitive at all that I have to 'reply to all' if I want to respond to the list because 'the list' is one single mailing address to me (pd-list@iem.at).
However, now that I know how to deal with it, I'm OK with how it is. Urs
vade schrieb:
I have to agree, making the reply-to set to pd-list@iem.at mailto:pd-list@iem.at would just be a nice 'quality of life' improvement for everyone on the list...
the list-post header isnt really an excuse...
*v a d e //*
*http://homepage.mac.com/doktorp/* *doktorp@mac.com mailto:doktorp@mac.com* **
On Jul 18, 2005, at 10:50 AM, Frank Barknecht wrote:
Hallo,
this topic has been discussed a lot of times, you may want to search the archives.
Urs Liska hat gesagt: // Urs Liska wrote:
is there a special reason why this list's emails don't have a reply-to header?
They have a "List-Post"-header.
Ciao
Frank Barknecht _ ______footils.org__
_ __latest track: "plak" @ http://footils.org/cms/show/44
PD-list@iem.at mailto:PD-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
PD-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list