Hi, Olaf Matthes hat gesagt: // Olaf Matthes wrote:
some people were independently reporting success in porting some of the objects to linux but nowbody ported them all...
This is my problem as well: I cannot build the whole library, but the single externals often don't load. This surely is something simple, so my developer question is: What needs to be changed to, say, scrub~.c to make it standalone? I never wrote a library of externals so it is not clear to me: What is the difference inside the sources between a standalone external and one designed for a library?
My goal was to completely port PeRColate, regardless what other STK based objects already were available. I only excluded objects we already have as core Pd objects. In the end I even ported the video stuff
This sounds very reasonable.
At least on Win the two other ways of getting parts of STK into Pd don't work (aren't ported yet), as far as I know. Anyway, I really would like to support someone who wants to port PeRColate to Linux. Maybe I can take this opportunity to learn how to write Linux compatible code.... I would probably try a OS X port if can get hands on a OS X machine again.
Actually I don't think, that you have a lot of incompatible code in it. For example scrubber (which I tested again now) builds nearly out of the box. I only had to change an "int i" to an "unsigned int i" in scrub_new(void) to make the compiler happy, but that is not Linux specific at all and it would be a problem, if the Makefile wouldn't treat warnings as errors ("-Werror")
I think, it would help to have at least some externals from the library working, and fix the rest later.
ciao
Frank Barknecht _ ______footils.org__