The main loop of the object will still compute the value for a zero Hz signal (always 1), and output blocks. So, in this case an argument of zero shouldn't use any less CPU.
On Sun, 31 Jan 2010 22:12:19 +0000 Andrew Faraday jbturgid@hotmail.com wrote:
Hey Folks I'm aware that cutting the signal from an [osc~] will not actually reduce it's processor drain, nor, to my knowledge, does the frequency affect CPU usage. However, does anyone know if it'll take less processor, while not using the output of the object, to give it an argument of 0? That is to say, while the output has [*~] + 0 that zero is also set to the frequency of the [osc~] will this be any more efficient? Thanks Andrew
_________________________________________________________________ We want to hear all your funny, exciting and crazy Hotmail stories. Tell us now http://clk.atdmt.com/UKM/go/195013117/direct/01/