here...
https://mathr.co.uk/blog/2015-04-21_approximating_cosine.html
with an update here...
https://mathr.co.uk/blog/2016-07-20_approximating_cosine_update.html
cheers Miller
On Tue, Dec 05, 2017 at 11:15:54PM -0500, Matt Barber wrote:
I'd be interested to look at Claude Heiland's implementation in any case. To be clear, it sounds like you're talking about the oscillator performance and not just building the table?
On Tue, Dec 5, 2017 at 1:58 PM, Miller Puckette msp@ucsd.edu wrote:
Claude Heiland has a much better cosine implementation that's faster and more accurate - but I need to do some profiling to see how to compile it so that it gets the speeds he gets. Someone else could look at it I guess but I'll certainly have to spend some time with it myself too. So it's for 0.49.
cheers Miller
On Tue, Dec 05, 2017 at 04:54:02PM -0200, Alexandre Torres Porres wrote:
2017-12-05 1:12 GMT-02:00 Miller Puckette msp@ucsd.edu:
That one needs a lot more work...
I see... anything we could try and do it for you? Or would you rather tackle it yourself for 0.49 or something?
Pd-list@lists.iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> https://lists.puredata.info/
listinfo/pd-list
Pd-list@lists.iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> https://lists.puredata.info/ listinfo/pd-list
Pd-list@lists.iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list