Thanks, now I get it! I changed my patch accordingly. I wasn't even aware that sending the same number twice will screw things up (because I've probably never done it). Cheers
Gesendet: Dienstag, 08. Dezember 2015 um 20:59 Uhr Von: "Alexandre Torres Porres" porres@gmail.com An: "Christof Ressi" christof.ressi@gmx.at Cc: "pd-list@lists.iem.at" pd-list@lists.iem.at Betreff: Re: Re: [PD] no "clear" message option in [cyclone/delay~], [delwrite~] and [z~]
in your patch, a number triggers a clear message to rpole~, if the number is the same, it clears it and ruins the patch forever, a [change] object prevents this. see attachment. 2015-12-08 17:46 GMT-02:00 Christof Ressi christof.ressi@gmx.at:I don't quite get it, how does a number clear [rpole~] in the first place?
Gesendet: Dienstag, 08. Dezember 2015 um 20:38 Uhr Von: "Alexandre Torres Porres" <porres@gmail.com[porres@gmail.com]> An: "Christof Ressi" <christof.ressi@gmx.at[christof.ressi@gmx.at]> Cc: "Matt Barber" <brbrofsvl@gmail.com[brbrofsvl@gmail.com]>, "pd-list@lists.iem.at[pd-list@lists.iem.at]" <pd-list@lists.iem.at[pd-list@lists.iem.at]> Betreff: Re: [PD] no "clear" message option in [cyclone/delay~], [delwrite~] and [z~]
Actually, [z~] is cleared everytime you change the right inlet
Cool So you just need a [change] object to prevent the same number from clearing [rpole~], that's why I was having a problem with it!