Hi Christof
On Sat, 2022-01-15 at 15:51 +0100, Christof Ressi wrote:
Oh, interesting. Haven't tried myself yet, but good to know that many patches wouldn't work. I can't get around using [receive~].
Have you seen my last reply ( https://lists.puredata.info/pipermail/pd-list/2022-01/130716.html)? It describes how to fix this. (I would not recommend doing this in practice, though.)
Yeah, thanks, I read it _after_ I wrote my last mail. That's good to know.
If more people think that they need to run Pd at a lower scheduler block size, we should think about making it a runtime option. AFAICT, there is no technical reason why it has to be a compile time constant.
It's not that I'm requesting it, but if it was there, I'd certainly play around with it. I just wanted to check if it is feasible and also if it makes sense at all. If this is a sensible thing, I'll put it into a feature request.
Roman