20 Feb
2008
20 Feb
'08
5:52 p.m.
Even smarter might be to skip Pd-extended 0.40 and go straight from 0.39 to 0.41.
cheers Miller
On Wed, Feb 20, 2008 at 05:44:54PM +0100, IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote:
IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote:
obviously it is incompatible. the reason to nevertheless do change it was, that [list length] was not introduced before 0.40, which keeps the potential number of victims low (esp. since Pd-extended has not yet made it so far); if the behaviour ever needs to be changed, better do it NOW than later.
which reminds me: i think it would be good if Pd-extended-0.40 would have a fixed version of [list length].
fgmadsr. IOhannes
PD-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list