Enrique Erne wrote:
just out of curiosity: >~.pd, <~.pd, sgn~ and what else in zexy are
already pd-vanilla abstractions (some of them are both abstractions
and externals for performance reasons); is there an advantage in
collecting these things in yet another arbitrary (as opposed to
grouped by functionality) library?where are any abstractions/externals "grouped by functionality"? do you mean pdmtl?
i didn't mean any special library; it was rather a comment on the absence of "grouped by functionality" libs.
just to be clear: the files netpd.org/eni/purepd/ are not collected as library, they are just there since i have no other place to put them and it could be useful for purepd reasons.
i did not want to offend you for pointing to your files.
the thing i was asking about was, whether these objects should be added to another arbitrary library in svn (a request for which i paranoidedly sensed), without any benefit.
the svn purepd patches contain some abstractions that confuse me a bit. actually i would like to contribute to purepd. (i.e. why is there moses and clip?)
well, it proves hat you don't need an external to use them :-) i guess it is rather didactic, but i don't see any harm in having them there.
fgmadsr IOhannes