Re: buffers

-- Gabriel Maldonado http://web.tiscalinet.it/G-Maldonado Miller Puckette wrote: > > Hi Marius, > > I thought W98 did much better for latency than you described, more > like 20 msec. It might be that you have to specify a "-audiobuf" to > tune it. My W98 machine died (and my W98 CD too) so I can't check it > any more... > > cheers > Miller > > On Tue, Oct 31, 2000 at 09:04:37AM +0100, smedge wrote: > > hi list. > > im really wondering, if others have the same buffering-times that i > > have, or if there is a way to change things. > > i work on win95, my cpu is a 400mhz. i use a event "gina" sound card > > (2in, 8out), but have also testet awe 64gold and pci128 soundblaster. my > > lowest buffertime (to run in, out, midi and 44.1 khz was about 200 msec > > (with the pci128!). on all lower buffers windows is closing the audio > > devices. > > this weekend i watched msp on the mac, which was running on G3 350mhz, > > which has a buffer of 256 samples (or even lower). > > is windows unable to have the same performance??? (which results do you > > get with NT or linux?) > > or is it the soundcard the problem. > > tricks? or treat... > > marius.