Re: [PD] Re: New PDP/PiDiP for OSX

puede ser una equivocation, but lib Xv is not delivered in the pdp package, it should be part of the X server.

ciao, sevy

Patrick Pagano wrote:

Sevvy!!!

I am so sorry! I meant "rats" as an expression similar to "darn" rats was NOT BY ANY MEANS EVER meant to be a descriptor of you It was to be "Oh Rats, it won't work for my machine".

Sorry that translated so badly.

sincerely Patrick

On Wednesday, March 24, 2004, at 06:48 PM, Yves Degoyon wrote:

Adam Lindsay wrote:

Yves,



but, by the way, i received some very unfriendly mails
from MAC users ( consumers ) UNHAPPY with their product
as if they were writing to a company dealer,



It's true that there can be some culture shock between the Pd (do-it-
yourselfers) and the Mac (click, and it just works) communities. I do
hope you're not discouraged by those folks, but Pat also rightly
brings
up the idea of pent-up demand and excitement.

i ever you're a linux or a mac user, there's no reason to call
someone a "rat"
just because your software doesn't work.



Anyway, some hints to potential users, and comments to Sevy:

If you get an error message on startup about pdp_text not finding a
default font, try this:

sudo cp pdp_pidip_osx/fonts/helmetr.ttf /usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/TTF/



that's in the installation notes...
http://ydegoyon.free.fr/INSTALL_NOTES.txt


The nifty pdp_ieee1394 object looks like it isn't re-entrant yet
(i.e.,
you can't create a second pdp_ieee1394 object, even in another patch
after one has been destroyed). This might show up with a bunch of
lines
like "pdp_ieee1394: SGIdle failed." or "pdp_ieee1394: grabber
initialization failed". If you run into this, I think the only way
to fix
it is to close pd and restart. It's not pretty, but from the
commented-
out code, it seems like there's some trouble with the implementation.

It's most irritating when trying out all the nifty sample patches!

Can the Gem/OSX folks offer any insight into this?


should be the case for pix_video, too, no?
some code of pix_video did not work also
because, in pdp, everything is excuted in a thread
( i guess it's the more likely reason ).

cheers,
sevy