Agreed on all fronts.
The reason i'm keen on having a master clock that's audio driven is because i also want to sync my step sequencer to looping audio buffers, playback with a phasor~
I see that this could also be done with with metro (i.e. trigger playback of the audio file)
On Sun, Sep 3, 2017 at 1:19 PM, Matt Davey hard.off@gmail.com wrote:
performance, as in CPU performance? For sure you're gonna get much greater performance using just messages.
It's also MUCH simpler to sequence with a [metro] and messages, and very easy to do interesting things to a sequence.
compare that to something like this, in the link claude just shared:
https://archive.bleu255.com/0xA/files/2016/04/010_shuffle.png
what a mess!
I see what you mean about having a single master clock, but why not just have a single master clock that's based on [metro] and a counter? You can use that clock to trigger sub-clocks to whatever resolution you like, right down to subsample accuracy.