5 Jan
2008
5 Jan
'08
11:03 p.m.
I'd still have to track changes in the OSC code and periodically "import" them to the Pd sources, which is very error-prone.
... and to answer Mathieu's question as to why I prefer FUDI, it's just simpler.
cheers Miller
On Sat, Jan 05, 2008 at 02:17:55PM -0500, Martin Peach wrote:
Miller Puckette wrote:
I'm still thinking about it. On the plus side, it would make Pd users' lives easier; on the minus, it would introduce a new library dependence and thus reduce Pd's portability.
Which library is that? If it was integrated into pd the library would be pd.
Martin
PD-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list