chris,
this (Mac OS X 10.4 i386http://downloads.sourceforge.net/pure-data/Pd-0.39.3-extended-macosx104-i386.dmg (Mac Pro, MacBook, all Intel Macs) [md5http://puredata.info/md5sum/Pd-0.39.3-extended-macosx104-i386.dmg.md5/at_download/file]) is the version i have been downloading from puredata.info also chris, you are a former S.A.I.C graduate, am i right?
On Mon, Apr 7, 2008 at 2:19 PM, chris clepper cgclepper@gmail.com wrote:
You need x86 versions of your libraries. 0.38.4 probably ran entirely under Rosetta emulation while 0.39 is Intel native. Downloading full pd-extended for OSX Intel should get the right set.
On Mon, Apr 7, 2008 at 1:46 PM, Ben Carney bfcarney@gmail.com wrote:
Hello there all Can anyone explain to me why libraries load so much better for me in the 0.38.4 version of extended compared to 0.39.?
All of my libraries load in the previous version, but in the new version, I get this.
/Applications/Pd-extended.app/Contents/Resources/Scripts/../extra/fftease.pd_darwin: dlopen(/Applications/Pd-extended.app/Contents/Resources/Scripts/../extra/fftease.pd_darwin, 10): no suitable image found. Did find: /Applications/Pd-extended.app/Contents/Resources/Scripts/../extra/fftease.pd_darwin: mach-o, but wrong architecture fftease: can't load library iemabs: can't load library iemmatrix: can't load library liblist: can't load library PDP: pure data packet version 0.12.5-darcs PiDiP : additional video processing objects for PDP : version 0.12.20 ( ydegoyon@free.fr )
I have tried alot of different methods of recognizing libraries to no avail.
--
Ben C.
PD-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list