On May 18, 2007, at 12:52 PM, [*~] wrote:
Derek Holzer said :
Well, since everybody else is doing it....
[x] normal.png [ ] bold.png
Bold is just too heavy and space-filling for normal use. The
ability to switch to bold (or even designate certain comments as boldface) seems much more logical, captain.[x] bold.png
hum, i would vote for bold. although i can understand the space- filling issue, bold is still easier to read(for me). besides, it might also be eaiser for new users too,
making reading help/tutorial files less painfull..
I am curious why you would choose bold here, yet in desiredata, you
choose a normal font. Is there some specifics about the font
itself? Maybe it would make sense to draw the boxes lighter, like
not quite black, but more a dark gray. That would make the normal
font stand out more.
.hc
cheers
chun
d.
-- derek holzer ::: http://www.umatic.nl ---Oblique Strategy # 19: "Be dirty"
PD-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/ listinfo/pd-list
PD-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/ listinfo/pd-list
You can't steal a gift. Bird gave the world his music, and if you can
hear it, you can have it. - Dizzy Gillespie