Good afternoon, Eni, :)
Le dimanche 10 juin 2007 à 12:24 +0200, Enrique Erne a écrit :
good morning patrice
i thought you got the patch through netpd's creator.
I'm sorry, I've mixed two different discussions, this part wasn't net-pd related.
please tell me which patch is missing an abstraction and where you got it from, sp i can fix it. at least it should be mentioned in the wiki.
Concerning net-pd, I'd rather have suggestions that certainly won't be taken into account, because I've ever given a try in net-pd chat, it's about aesthetic of some patches, for example, one you've developped called 'jamx'; this sequencer is very usefull, ... but it misses very handfull things for composing faster, like copy-paste between each page, colored buttons. Let alone the missing polyphonic stuff, I know how it could be difficult to make one with pd-vanilla gui, and that you have ever done a good very job.
i don't know if creator can update itself, but that sounds like micrsoft/apple "new software has been installed, your computer is ready to restart" :-)
My mind might be corrupted by long years of composing on such environment, :D
netclient/netserver sends ascii data which we use for patches and control information.
Oh yes, and haven't you developped a patch that dynamically build patches from pd files, it's very interesting, I think it could be used for implementing on net-pd environment any pd-vanilla patch with replacing adc~ dac~ for connecting it to the mixer, sorry, my head is full of those kinds of crappy ideas...:p
i personally don't like the idea of an authority deciding which patches get accepted for the netpd project.
i prefer the free direct system it now has. if you fix a bug just increase the version msg and netload it again. every user connected get's the fix.
all the user have the same rights. no royalty. no "animalfarm" also the server is only the gate to others.. it doesn't do much else than sending the incoming msgs to the connected users.
Agreed.
see links http://www.netpd.org/mx http://www.netpd.org/I2mx http://www.netpd.org/HowtoBuildFx4Mx
Ok, thanks.
i don't think that it is a good idea to put these instructions into the abstractions.
not even an html link?
also you are very welcome to login the netpd chat and ask before you spend other 2 hours.
I'll be glad to have a jam session soon...
regards
eni
Best, Patko.