On Sat, 8 Nov 2003, Frank Barknecht wrote:
Hallo, Thomas Grill hat gesagt: // Thomas Grill wrote:
I visited this site (http://pd.iem.at/pdwiki/index.php?PdInternalMessages , which is great) and then, out of a misunderstanding (as i think), started to document the WikiWords appearing there, like symbol, gimme, float etc. It seems to be the case that pure text has been imported which contained some [...] words, resulting in a WikiWord interpretation.
No, I think this is a great idea in general. But of course, not every "gimme" should be interpreted as a Pd gimme, e.g. "gimme some time to fix that", but actually it is not. See for example: http://pd.iem.at/pdwiki/index.php?SandBox
So the gimmes on the InternalMessage page are actually marked up as things that might need documentation by the farsighted original author.
I only wonder, if the Pd-Wiki should not move over to pure-data.org somehow.
This should definitely be moved to pure-data.org. But instead of building new wiki-based sites, I think new stuff should be done in the Plone-style of making pages and publishing them. Its much more managable.
.hc
zen
\
\
\[D[D[D[D