On May 18, 2007, at 2:26 PM, Chris McCormick wrote:
On Fri, May 18, 2007 at 08:17:34AM +0200, Frank Barknecht wrote:
Hallo, Hans-Christoph Steiner hat gesagt: // Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
Many newbies think that Pd looks very strange. Many people have expressed gratitude for the switch to the normal weight font.
Why not make a vote? Attached are two screenshots, one with Vera
bold, one with Vera normal, both on Linux, both on pd-extended 0.40.Which do you prefer?
[ ] normal.png [ ] bold.png
I vote for:
pd -font=[whatever font you like]
Failing that, I vote for it looking the way that we are used to seeing it; courier 12 bold. I especially dislike the way Vera looks in these screen shots. If you're going to use a font like that then I beg
you to make it anti-aliased and stop my eyeballs from doing backflips.
Yeah, things look bad in those screenshots. I am not sure of Frank's
setup. I'll do more testing on GNU/Linux. Also, those PNGs are an
odd format (16bit?) so they were behaving strangely on my computer.
I converted them to gifs and they look better. Also, I have added
some screenshots from Mac OS X, where the fonts are anti-aliased:
http://pow.idmi.poly.edu/~hans/pdfonts/
Since there is obviously some demand for bold fonts, I added a new
flag that allows you to set the font weight from the command line or
pd-settings file. The flag is "-weight" and it expects either "bold"
or "normal". Also, for those who don't like Bitstream Vera Sans
Mono, there is the "-typeface" flag. Should be in tomorrows auto-
builds.
.hc
Best,
Chris.
PD-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/ listinfo/pd-list
You can't steal a gift. Bird gave the world his music, and if you can
hear it, you can have it. - Dizzy Gillespie