Hi,
just installed the last XP build. The program loads quite fast (but maybe
that's because I did it on my new desktop). But the problem with the
loading the patch still persists. Is there any relevant information that
can be collected from somewhere?
João
There is a bug in the prefs loading of Pd in general where it'll peg the
CPU while loading for a bit unless you specify npath and nloadlib.
Perhaps it is related to that?Right now would be a good time to download and try a nightly build.
AFAIK, there aren't any outstanding bugs. I just installed today's
build and ran it in Windows XP in an emulator (Parallels) on top of Mac
OS X, and it started up almost instantly..hc
On Jun 22, 2008, at 12:13 PM, João Pais wrote:
Hi,
going back to the subject of the long loading time of patches: before I suspected that it was due (besides some difference in the newer version) to several nested gops. that's not the case, as after switching off the gops it still takes as long (or maybe slightly less, but still too
long).Ah, and I think I didn't say: while all this time the patch is loading, cpu is at 100%.
XP, Pd version 0.40.3-extended-20080603
Or was there already improvements in this area? I don't go download the nightly builds each day, because sometimes they're unstable.
João Pais
--Friedenstr. 58 10249 Berlin Deutschland Tel +49 30 42020091 Mob +49 162 6843570 jmmmpais@googlemail.com skype: jmmmpjmmmp http://www.puredata.org/Members/jmmmp IBM Thinkpad R51, XP, Ubuntu GG Pd-Ext-0.39-2-t5, Pd Van 0.40-t2
Pd-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/ listinfo/pd-list
"[T]he greatest purveyor of violence in the world today [is] my own
government." - Martin Luther King, Jr.