4 Jan
2005
4 Jan
'05
9:52 a.m.
Mathieu Bouchard wrote:
On Mon, 3 Jan 2005, Krzysztof Czaja wrote:
which one should be produced?
(b) first 'test this bang', second no-op
hmm, i disagree with that. [bang( is bang and not a symbol "bang"! bang is an atomic event not containing data (not even a timestamp) how do you encapsulate such a time-based event within a data-set (like "test this bang") ?? this does not make sense to me at all
next time, people will come and ask how to attach numbers to an event [bang 3.14( ??
programming in time-domain is an important concept of patcher-like languages.
PS: (*please* don't say "you know, pd is not a programming language...")
but it is turing complete, so who cares...
mfg.as.dr IOhannes