31 Jan
2018
31 Jan
'18
1:22 a.m.
On Mit, 2018-01-31 at 00:49 +0100, katja wrote:
Found this in the archives, maybe it is somewhat similar: in the early Raspberry Pi days core switching seemed to be a problem for Pd and it could be solved by using 'taskset'.
Thanks for the -nosleep and the core affinity suggestion. I tried both and they don't seem to make a difference.
I'm a bit unsure about the -nosleep option. What is it supposed to do? I thought it would make Pd burn as many CPU cycles as it can get. And your mail from 2015 suggests a similar behavior. I run it like this:
pd -noprefs -nosleep -rt -jack -channels 2
and it still only runs at 3% of a core with the [adc~]-[dac~] patch. This is with Pd-0.48-1 (git 3417d9036).
Roman