2 Jan
2013
2 Jan
'13
6:58 p.m.
On 01/02/2013 04:24 PM, Claude Heiland-Allen wrote:
On 01/01/13 21:46, Mike McGonagle wrote:
Ideally, I would think that [throw~] could be extended (into a new object? [mthrow~] for multi-throw?). This object would also allow for these signals to be scaled independently for each destination added.
Multiple [throw~] can sum to corresponding [catch~] Multiple [receive~]/[r~] can receive from corresponding [send~]/[s~]
Something like this might work:
| | [throw~ a] [throw~ a] ...
[catch~ a] | [send~ b]
[receive~ b] [receive~ b] ... | |
I haven't tested but it might even be fine to use the same name for both.
yes. we've been using this idiom quite a lot. [catchsend~ foo] == [catch~ $1]->[send $1]
gfmadsr IOhannes