29 Apr
2004
29 Apr
'04
2:28 p.m.
vanDongen/Gilcher wrote:
Did you try it with pdp -> pdp2gem -> pix_texture2 etc..
is there any specific reason for using [pix_texture2] instead of [pix_texture] ?
It works for me, and , for some reason, the pdp image is much better quality than the gem one.
this is really interesting; when i have time i will have a look at this...
On Thursday 29 April 2004 02:31, Ian Smith-Heisters wrote:
Maybe this will shed some light. Before the big kernel compile snafu, PDP couldn't grab frames either. Now PDP can, but Gem still can't.
i'm sorry but i cannot help you here; does it work when you do some image-transformation, esp [pix_rgba], [pix_yuv] or [pix_grey] ?
mfg.a.sdr IOhannes