[expr pow($f1,$f2)] or [expr~ pow($v1,$f2)] or [expr~ pow($v1,$v2)] etc.
I don't know why you consider this an omission? JP
Andy Farnell wrote:
Yes. Please don't take this the wrong way Derek, I sincerely appreciate the suggestion.
Everything can be done with [expr~], so why don't we just rename Pd to [expr~]? :)
Seriously, raising one number to a power is an essential, fundamental operation Is there any plausible excuse for its omission from core Pd?
On Mon, 21 Apr 2008 20:53:00 +0200 Derek Holzer derek@umatic.nl wrote:
Can the job be done with [expr~]?
d.
Andy Farnell wrote:
Did I read that Cyclone is to be incorporated into vanilla Pd?
Having discovered too late that [pow~] is not part of vanilla I am about to remove the constraint of using vanilla Pd for the synthetic sound design book since it is incomplete without basic mathematical operators.
andy
-- derek holzer ::: http://www.umatic.nl ::: http://blog.myspace.com/macumbista ---Oblique Strategy # 190: "You can only make one dot at a time"