On Mon, 12 Dec 2005, Marc Lavallée wrote:
Le 12 Décembre 2005 20:54, vous avez écrit :
On Mon, 12 Dec 2005, Marc Lavalléee wrote:
No. The effort is about software localization, not translation of a programming language.
In the context of PureData, those two things are curiously similar.
Even you don't get it? Gee... ;-) http://www.linuxjournal.com/article/6176
Just because GNU Gettext is considered a standard by many, doesn't mean that I have to use it. There are several reasons not to. And then I still don't "get it", because it's so obvious that you can't even say what it is that "even" I don't get.
Applescript files could be compiled in English and decompiled in French. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AppleScript#AppleScript_dialects
Neat! :)
It would be impractical, because PD's language is graphical and not using a natural language metaphor.
Pd is hybrid: it's definitely textual to a large extent.
Appart from the PDPP crew, who's writing their patches using a text editor?
I'm not saying that, you silly. I'm talking about objectboxes and messageboxes. They contain written code.
Get famous 50 years after your death from a bad larynx cancer, as a painter (of course),
50 years after death? I thought copyright lasted longer than that nowadays...
_ _ __ ___ _____ ________ _____________ _____________________ ... | Mathieu Bouchard - tél:+1.514.383.3801 - http://artengine.ca/matju | Freelance Digital Arts Engineer, Montréal QC Canada