That was my first idea, then I chose nn because "Less typing is a Good Thing". Now I think ann_mlp is a good idea because: ann_som is about self organized maps ann_mlp is about multilayer perceptrons (waiting for ann_rfb etc..) This way all names are unified and coders know that ann_ is where they should look for Neural Networks.
I personally like both "fann" and "ann_mlp"..
Let's start a poll!
Do you prefer brevity or uniformity?
-----Messaggio originale----- Da: pd-list-bounces@iem.at [mailto:pd-list-bounces@iem.at] Per conto di Frank Barknecht Inviato: lunedì 9 maggio 2005 23.02 A: pd-list@iem.at Oggetto: Re: R: [PD] New external on neural networks
Hallo, Davide Morelli hat gesagt: // Davide Morelli wrote:
The next version will be renamed from "nn" to "ann_mlp",
Just wondering: Why not call it "fann"? Less typing is a Good Thing and AFAIK "fann" is still free.
Ciao
Frank Barknecht _ ______footils.org__
_ __latest track: "scans" _ http://footils.org/cms/show/41
PD-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
-- No virus found in this incoming message. Checked by AVG Anti-Virus. Version: 7.0.308 / Virus Database: 266.11.3 - Release Date: 03/05/2005